Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  Question about Measuring Supervisor-rated Performance

    Posted 03-15-2018 16:40
    Dear Colleagues,

    I'm a doctoral candidate at Rutgers University, and I'm looking for a short (non-ESM), established measure of supervisor-rated performance to use in my dissertation research. I'm specifically looking for measures that capture (1) in-role/task performance, (2) organizationally-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors (OCB-O), and (3) interpersonally-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors (OCB-I).

    Thus far the shortest measure of in-role performance I've found is the four item Eisenberger, Armeli, Rexwinkel, Lynch, & Rhoades (2001) measure, and the shortest measures I've found for OCB-O and OCB-I are the seven item subscales in Williams and Anderson's (1991) performance measure.

    I would appreciate any suggestions you have for shorter scales I might use to mitigate supervisors' survey fatigue.

    Thank you in advance!

    Best Regards,
    Emily

    --
    Emily Rosado-Solomon
    PhD Candidate, Industrial Relations and Human Resources
    School of Management and Labor Relations
    Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
    94 Rockafeller Road
    Piscataway, NJ 08854


  • 2.  Question about Measuring Supervisor-rated Performance

    Posted 03-16-2018 11:30
    Hi Emily,

    Wright and Cropanzano (1998) used a 1-item measure of performance [Overall, how would you rate this employee's performance over the last six months? (1 = poor, 5 = excellent)], and Blader and Tyler (2009) used a 3-item measure of extrarole behaviors in study 1 fwiw.

    I'm sure you've discussed this with your committee members already, but you also want to anticipate what reviewers are going to say. We (myself included) all want short surveys, but using short, less-established surveys can sometimes hurt our chances of publishing our work. Just something to think about prior to collecting your data.

    Good luck!

    Jeremy


    On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 1:40 PM, Emily Rosado-Solomon <emily.rosado.solomon@rutgers.edu> wrote:
    Dear Colleagues,

    I'm a doctoral candidate at Rutgers University, and I'm looking for a short (non-ESM), established measure of supervisor-rated performance to use in my dissertation research. I'm specifically looking for measures that capture (1) in-role/task performance, (2) organizationally-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors (OCB-O), and (3) interpersonally-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors (OCB-I).

    Thus far the shortest measure of in-role performance I've found is the four item Eisenberger, Armeli, Rexwinkel, Lynch, & Rhoades (2001) measure, and the shortest measures I've found for OCB-O and OCB-I are the seven item subscales in Williams and Anderson's (1991) performance measure.

    I would appreciate any suggestions you have for shorter scales I might use to mitigate supervisors' survey fatigue.

    Thank you in advance!

    Best Regards,
    Emily

    --
    Emily Rosado-Solomon
    PhD Candidate, Industrial Relations and Human Resources
    School of Management and Labor Relations
    Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
    94 Rockafeller Road
    Piscataway, NJ 08854



  • 3.  Question about Measuring Supervisor-rated Performance

    Posted 03-16-2018 11:42
    Hi Emily,

    You might find these 3-item scales below very helpful. Of course, depending on your research question and whether you expect differential effects on OCB-O and OCBI, you may also consider using the three item OCB scale used by Liden and colleagues (2007). The 3-items taps into OCB toward the organization, supervisor, and coworkers.

    EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE:
    1. This employee is very competent
    2. This employee gets its work done very effectively
    3. This employee has performed its job well

    Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S., & Cha, S. E. (2007). Embracing transformational leadership: team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance. Journal of applied psychology92(4), 1020-1030.

    EMPLOYEE OCB:
    1. This employee volunteers to do things not formally required by the job
    2. This employee assists me with my duties when needed even though it may not be formally required
    3. This employee helps others when their workload increases even though it may not be formally required by the job.

    Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Jaworski, R. A., & Bennett, N. (2004). Social loafing: A field investigation. Journal of Management30(2), 285-304.

    Best of luck with your research!


    Stay well and keep thriving,

    Mayowa
     
    Mayowa Babalola, PhD
    Faculty, Peter Faber Business School
    Centre for Sustainable HRM and Wellbeing | http://cshw.acu.edu.au/our-team/
    Australian Catholic University

     

    Room 7.20, Level 7, 250 Victoria Parade,
    East Melbourne, Victoria 3002
    T: +61 3 9230 8315, +61 4 1044 1799,
     
    Australian Catholic University & the courses offered by the University are registered on the Commonwealth Register of Institutions and Courses for Overseas Students (CRICOS). Provider registration codes: ABN 15 050 192 660 CRICOS Reg. 00004G. 
    This correspondence is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information or both. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by this transmission. If you receive this correspondence in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or rely on any part of this correspondence if you are not the intended recipient.

    On Mar 16, 2018, at 7:40 AM, Emily Rosado-Solomon <emily.rosado.solomon@RUTGERS.EDU> wrote:

    Dear Colleagues,

    I'm a doctoral candidate at Rutgers University, and I'm looking for a short (non-ESM), established measure of supervisor-rated performance to use in my dissertation research. I'm specifically looking for measures that capture (1) in-role/task performance, (2) organizationally-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors (OCB-O), and (3) interpersonally-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors (OCB-I).

    Thus far the shortest measure of in-role performance I've found is the four item Eisenberger, Armeli, Rexwinkel, Lynch, & Rhoades (2001) measure, and the shortest measures I've found for OCB-O and OCB-I are the seven item subscales in Williams and Anderson's (1991) performance measure.

    I would appreciate any suggestions you have for shorter scales I might use to mitigate supervisors' survey fatigue.

    Thank you in advance!

    Best Regards,
    Emily

    --
    Emily Rosado-Solomon
    PhD Candidate, Industrial Relations and Human Resources
    School of Management and Labor Relations
    Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
    94 Rockafeller Road
    Piscataway, NJ 08854