Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  Question about text analytics software

    Posted 10-31-2016 09:18
    Colleagues

    I was wondering if anyone has any thoughts on SPSS Text Analytics software (through SPSS Modeler Text Analytics program) vs NVIVO ? From a first glance at manuals, NVIVO looks more user friendly, but was wondering if anyone had experience with both that they could share ? 

    Thanks in advance

    Jeanine Andreassi, Ph.D.
    Associate Professor, Sacred Heart University



  • 2.  Question about text analytics software

    Posted 10-31-2016 11:19

    Jeanine,


    The following article describes several software options (e.g., LIWC 2007, DICTION 5) and advantages and disadvantages of each-including how to gather information about the reliability of resulting scores which to date has mostly been assumed to be perfect (i.e., absence of measurement error):

     

    ·       McKenny, A. F., Aguinis, H., Short, J. C., & Anglin, A. H. in press. What doesn't get measured does exist: Improving the accuracy of computer-aided text analysis. Journal of Management. doi: 10.1177/0149206316657594 [available at http://hermanaguinis.com/pubs.html]

     

    I hope this helps!

     

    All the best,

     

    --Herman.

     

    Abstract

    Computer-aided text analysis (CATA) is a form of content analysis that enables the measurement of constructs by processing text into quantitative data based on the frequency of words. CATA has been proposed as a useful measurement approach with the potential to lead to important theory advancements. Ironically, while CATA has been offered to overcome some of the known deficiencies in existing measurement approaches, we have lagged behind in regard to assessing the technique's measurement rigor. Our article addresses this knowledge gap and describes important implications for past as well as future research using CATA. First, we describe three sources of measurement error variance that are particularly relevant to studies using CATA: transient error, specific factor error, and algorithm error. Second, we describe and demonstrate how to calculate measurement error variance with the entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation, and organizational ambidexterity constructs, offering evidence that past substantive conclusions have been underestimated. Third, we offer best-practice recommendations and demonstrate how to reduce measurement error variance by refining existing CATA measures. In short, we demonstrate that although measurement error variance in CATA has not been measured thus far, it does exist and it affects substantive conclusions. Consequently our article has implications for theory, practice, as well as how to assess and minimize measurement error in future CATA research with the goal of improving the accuracy of substantive conclusions.

     

    Herman Aguinis, Ph.D.

    Avram Tucker Distinguished Scholar and Professor of Management

    George Washington University School of Business

    2201 G Street, NW

    Washington, DC 20052

    http://hermanaguinis.com/

     

     

    From: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv [mailto:OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG] On Behalf Of Jeanine Phippen
    Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 9:18 AM
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG
    Subject: [OB-LIST] Question about text analytics software

     

    Colleagues

     

    I was wondering if anyone has any thoughts on SPSS Text Analytics software (through SPSS Modeler Text Analytics program) vs NVIVO ? From a first glance at manuals, NVIVO looks more user friendly, but was wondering if anyone had experience with both that they could share ? 

     

    Thanks in advance

     

    Jeanine Andreassi, Ph.D.

    Associate Professor, Sacred Heart University

     



  • 3.  Question about text analytics software

    Posted 10-31-2016 14:45

    Hi Jeanine,

    I can only speak to NVivo, but I have used it  and trained others on it for 13 years now and it has become not only much more user friendly, but is covering a lot of ground in regards to types of resource data it can handle.  I highly recommend it.  Even though they are based in Australia, I found QSR very responsive and helpful when I had a major dilemma (like how to upload data from two open ended response fields from 700 participants).  They also regularly ask for feedback on how to help researchers and I've just found them incredibly interested in what we need and how they can provide it.  I also highly recommend the NVivo books by Dr. Pat Bazeley she is a guru of sorts on NVivo and her texts have saved me on many a project.  I also recommend the NVivo help group on LinkedIn, were Dr. Bazeley will jump in to help researchers with NVivo queries.  


    So I know that gives you nothing on SPSS, but for what it's worth, I wanted to share my experience that NVivo is well supported and useful for this kind of work.  


    Elaine Alden, PhD.

    Program Chair, Sociology

    Ashford University



    From: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG> on behalf of Jeanine Phippen <jkandreassi@GMAIL.COM>
    Sent: 31 October 2016 13:17
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG
    Subject: [OB-LIST] Question about text analytics software
     
    Colleagues

    I was wondering if anyone has any thoughts on SPSS Text Analytics software (through SPSS Modeler Text Analytics program) vs NVIVO ? From a first glance at manuals, NVIVO looks more user friendly, but was wondering if anyone had experience with both that they could share ? 

    Thanks in advance

    Jeanine Andreassi, Ph.D.
    Associate Professor, Sacred Heart University



  • 4.  Question about text analytics software

    Posted 11-01-2016 04:21

    Hi Jeanine,

    I've been using NVIVO for years, first during my doctoral studies. I, too, find it incredibly user friendly, and the support from Australia is first class. The texts mentioned below are very helpful.

    I haven't used SPSS as I haven't felt the need to.

    Hope that helps,

     

    Yvonne McNulty

    SIM University

    Singapore

     

     

     

    From: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG> on behalf of E Louise Alden <e.alden@HOTMAIL.COM>
    Reply-To: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG>
    Date: Tuesday, 1 November 2016 at 2:45 AM
    To: <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG>
    Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] Question about text analytics software

     

    Hi Jeanine,

    I can only speak to NVivo, but I have used it  and trained others on it for 13 years now and it has become not only much more user friendly, but is covering a lot of ground in regards to types of resource data it can handle.  I highly recommend it.  Even though they are based in Australia, I found QSR very responsive and helpful when I had a major dilemma (like how to upload data from two open ended response fields from 700 participants).  They also regularly ask for feedback on how to help researchers and I've just found them incredibly interested in what we need and how they can provide it.  I also highly recommend the NVivo books by Dr. Pat Bazeley she is a guru of sorts on NVivo and her texts have saved me on many a project.  I also recommend the NVivo help group on LinkedIn, were Dr. Bazeley will jump in to help researchers with NVivo queries.  

     

    So I know that gives you nothing on SPSS, but for what it's worth, I wanted to share my experience that NVivo is well supported and useful for this kind of work.  

     

    Elaine Alden, PhD.

    Program Chair, Sociology

    Ashford University

     

    From: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG> on behalf of Jeanine Phippen <jkandreassi@GMAIL.COM>
    Sent: 31 October 2016 13:17
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG
    Subject: [OB-LIST] Question about text analytics software

     

    Colleagues

     

    I was wondering if anyone has any thoughts on SPSS Text Analytics software (through SPSS Modeler Text Analytics program) vs NVIVO ? From a first glance at manuals, NVIVO looks more user friendly, but was wondering if anyone had experience with both that they could share ? 

     

    Thanks in advance

     

    Jeanine Andreassi, Ph.D.

    Associate Professor, Sacred Heart University

     



  • 5.  Question about text analytics software

    Posted 11-01-2016 19:46

    Hi Jeanine,

     

    I have found NVivo to be extremely useful for text analysis. While there is a slightly upward learning curve, the systematic layout and workflow of the software make it relatively quick to adapt to.

     

    Another use I have found for it is to organize my literature reviews through NVivo – the nodes of NVivo allows you to categorize direct quotes, findings, empirical works etc.

     

    Further, as ascertained by others – the support from the QSR is really great. I'll also echo that Dr Pat Bazeley's book is a great resource for NVivo users.

     

    Best regards,

    Mulyadi

     

    --

    DR MULYADI ROBIN

    Lecturer in Leadership and Management

     

    Monash Business School

    Monash University

    Level 6, Building N6.29, Caulfield Campus

    900 Dandenong Road

    Caulfield East VIC 3145

    Australia

     

    T: +61 3 9903 2635

    E: mulyadi.robin@monash.edu

    monash.edu

     

    CRICOS Provider 00008C/ 01857J 

     

    We engage in the highest quality research and education to have a positive impact on a changing world

     

     

     

     

    From: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG> on behalf of Yvonne McNulty <ymcnulty@EXPATRESEARCH.COM>
    Reply-To: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG>
    Date: Tuesday, 1 November 2016 at 7:20 pm
    To: <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG>
    Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] Question about text analytics software

     

    Hi Jeanine,

    I've been using NVIVO for years, first during my doctoral studies. I, too, find it incredibly user friendly, and the support from Australia is first class. The texts mentioned below are very helpful.

    I haven't used SPSS as I haven't felt the need to.

    Hope that helps,

     

    Yvonne McNulty

    SIM University

    Singapore

     

     

     

    From: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG> on behalf of E Louise Alden <e.alden@HOTMAIL.COM>
    Reply-To: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG>
    Date: Tuesday, 1 November 2016 at 2:45 AM
    To: <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG>
    Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] Question about text analytics software

     

    Hi Jeanine,

    I can only speak to NVivo, but I have used it  and trained others on it for 13 years now and it has become not only much more user friendly, but is covering a lot of ground in regards to types of resource data it can handle.  I highly recommend it.  Even though they are based in Australia, I found QSR very responsive and helpful when I had a major dilemma (like how to upload data from two open ended response fields from 700 participants).  They also regularly ask for feedback on how to help researchers and I've just found them incredibly interested in what we need and how they can provide it.  I also highly recommend the NVivo books by Dr. Pat Bazeley she is a guru of sorts on NVivo and her texts have saved me on many a project.  I also recommend the NVivo help group on LinkedIn, were Dr. Bazeley will jump in to help researchers with NVivo queries.  

     

    So I know that gives you nothing on SPSS, but for what it's worth, I wanted to share my experience that NVivo is well supported and useful for this kind of work.  

     

    Elaine Alden, PhD.

    Program Chair, Sociology

    Ashford University

     

    From: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG> on behalf of Jeanine Phippen <jkandreassi@GMAIL.COM>
    Sent: 31 October 2016 13:17
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG
    Subject: [OB-LIST] Question about text analytics software

     

    Colleagues

     

    I was wondering if anyone has any thoughts on SPSS Text Analytics software (through SPSS Modeler Text Analytics program) vs NVIVO ? From a first glance at manuals, NVIVO looks more user friendly, but was wondering if anyone had experience with both that they could share ? 

     

    Thanks in advance

     

    Jeanine Andreassi, Ph.D.

    Associate Professor, Sacred Heart University

     



  • 6.  Question about text analytics software

    Posted 11-02-2016 04:17
    Hi Jeanine

    I have been a long time user of all three major qualitative content analysis tools:

    • nVivo
    • atlas.ti
    • MaxQDA

    Out of these three, MaxQDA is the one I stayed with, because it has many features, including setting up the interface so that it fits your logic and the not the logic of the developers. I have always been a fan of using software that adapts to my way of thinking rather than having to learn a software's way of thinking (which often does not allow me to do what I actually want).

    While nVivo and MaxQDA are fairly similar, I absolutely don't like nVivo nomenclature, in particular their use of the term 'node'. In nVivo, everything can be a node, even a node itself (which is a logical fallacy). For simple coding work this might not be problematic, but for more complex hierarchical structures and relationships of coding themes, this becomes more irritating than anything. In that respect MaxQDA is certainly a better choice. Also, MaxQDA has rich integration with SPSS and other software, i.e. you can import quite a range of project files from other software. As far as atlas.ti is concerned, it is unmatched in terms of importing from and exporting to SPSS. If you want to perform advanced co-occurrence analysis with SPSS, it is literally just one click to export your entire project to SPSS and continue from there.

    However, the choice very much depends on what type of analysis you want to conduct. These three are all good for thematic coding, but if you look for something that is closer to 'corpus analysis', then there are other tools. If you happen to know 'R', you could also use some of their packages for basic qualitative analysis.

    If you have quite a lot of data, I would recommend MaxQDA over nVivo. Admittedly, nVivo might 'look' more appealing, but MaxQDA seemed more flexible and more geared towards larger datasets and lots of importing and exporting between different applications.

    I hope you find this helpful. Happy to answer any follow-up questions.

    Best
    Daniel
     


    Dr. Daniel Dauber
    Assistant Professor

    The Centre for Applied Linguistics,
    Social Sciences Building
    University of Warwick, Coventry
    CV4 7AL, UK

    Global Education Profiler (GE-P)
    A diagnostic tool for internationalising universities

    Find me on:

    On 2 November 2016 at 00:01:02, Mulyadi Robin (mulyadi.robin@monash.edu) wrote:

    Hi Jeanine,

     

    I have found NVivo to be extremely useful for text analysis. While there is a slightly upward learning curve, the systematic layout and workflow of the software make it relatively quick to adapt to.

     

    Another use I have found for it is to organize my literature reviews through NVivo – the nodes of NVivo allows you to categorize direct quotes, findings, empirical works etc.

     

    Further, as ascertained by others – the support from the QSR is really great. I'll also echo that Dr Pat Bazeley's book is a great resource for NVivo users.

     

    Best regards,

    Mulyadi

     

    --

    DR MULYADI ROBIN

    Lecturer in Leadership and Management

     

    Monash Business School

    Monash University

    Level 6, Building N6.29, Caulfield Campus

    900 Dandenong Road

    Caulfield East VIC 3145

    Australia

     

    T: +61 3 9903 2635

    E: mulyadi.robin@monash.edu

    monash.edu

     

    CRICOS Provider 00008C/ 01857J 

     

    We engage in the highest quality research and education to have a positive impact on a changing world

     

     

     

     

    From: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG> on behalf of Yvonne McNulty <ymcnulty@EXPATRESEARCH.COM>
    Reply-To: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG>
    Date: Tuesday, 1 November 2016 at 7:20 pm
    To: <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG>
    Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] Question about text analytics software

     

    Hi Jeanine,

    I've been using NVIVO for years, first during my doctoral studies. I, too, find it incredibly user friendly, and the support from Australia is first class. The texts mentioned below are very helpful.

    I haven't used SPSS as I haven't felt the need to.

    Hope that helps,

     

    Yvonne McNulty

    SIM University

    Singapore

     

     

     

    From: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG> on behalf of E Louise Alden <e.alden@HOTMAIL.COM>
    Reply-To: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG>
    Date: Tuesday, 1 November 2016 at 2:45 AM
    To: <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG>
    Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] Question about text analytics software

     

    Hi Jeanine,

    I can only speak to NVivo, but I have used it  and trained others on it for 13 years now and it has become not only much more user friendly, but is covering a lot of ground in regards to types of resource data it can handle.  I highly recommend it.  Even though they are based in Australia, I found QSR very responsive and helpful when I had a major dilemma (like how to upload data from two open ended response fields from 700 participants).  They also regularly ask for feedback on how to help researchers and I've just found them incredibly interested in what we need and how they can provide it.  I also highly recommend the NVivo books by Dr. Pat Bazeley she is a guru of sorts on NVivo and her texts have saved me on many a project.  I also recommend the NVivo help group on LinkedIn, were Dr. Bazeley will jump in to help researchers with NVivo queries.  

     

    So I know that gives you nothing on SPSS, but for what it's worth, I wanted to share my experience that NVivo is well supported and useful for this kind of work.  

     

    Elaine Alden, PhD.

    Program Chair, Sociology

    Ashford University

     

    From: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG> on behalf of Jeanine Phippen <jkandreassi@GMAIL.COM>
    Sent: 31 October 2016 13:17
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG
    Subject: [OB-LIST] Question about text analytics software

     

    Colleagues

     

    I was wondering if anyone has any thoughts on SPSS Text Analytics software (through SPSS Modeler Text Analytics program) vs NVIVO ? From a first glance at manuals, NVIVO looks more user friendly, but was wondering if anyone had experience with both that they could share ? 

     

    Thanks in advance

     

    Jeanine Andreassi, Ph.D.

    Associate Professor, Sacred Heart University

     



  • 7.  Question about text analytics software

    Posted 11-02-2016 08:19
    Hi Jeanine

    I am a user of T-Lab ... try it!!!

    michela
    ***************************************************
    Michela Cortini, PhD
    Assistant Prof. of Organizational Psychology
    Dept. of Psychological Sciences, Humanities
    and Territory - Di.S.P.U.Ter.
    University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti
    via dei Vestini 31, 66013 Chieti Scalo (Italy)
    tel. +39 0871 355 6601
    mobile +39 347 5945436
    e-mailcortini@unich.it
    ***************************************************


    "Dauber, Daniel" <D.Dauber@WARWICK.AC.UK> ha scritto:

    > Hi Jeanine
    >
    > I have been a long time user of all three major qualitative content
    > analysis tools:
    >
    >
    > * nVivo
    > * atlas.ti
    > * MaxQDA
    >
    > Out of these three, MaxQDA is the one I stayed with, because it has
    > many features, including setting up the interface so that it fits
    > your logic and the not the logic of the developers. I have always
    > been a fan of using software that adapts to my way of thinking
    > rather than having to learn a software’s way of thinking (which
    > often does not allow me to do what I actually want).
    >
    > While nVivo and MaxQDA are fairly similar, I absolutely don’t like
    > nVivo nomenclature, in particular their use of the term ‘node’. In
    > nVivo, everything can be a node, even a node itself (which is a
    > logical fallacy). For simple coding work this might not be
    > problematic, but for more complex hierarchical structures and
    > relationships of coding themes, this becomes more irritating than
    > anything. In that respect MaxQDA is certainly a better choice. Also,
    > MaxQDA has rich integration with SPSS and other software, i.e. you
    > can import quite a range of project files from other software. As
    > far as atlas.ti is concerned, it is unmatched in terms of importing
    > from and exporting to SPSS. If you want to perform advanced
    > co-occurrence analysis with SPSS, it is literally just one click to
    > export your entire project to SPSS and continue from there.
    >
    > However, the choice very much depends on what type of analysis you
    > want to conduct. These three are all good for thematic coding, but
    > if you look for something that is closer to ‘corpus analysis’, then
    > there are other tools. If you happen to know ‘R’, you could also use
    > some of their packages for basic qualitative analysis.
    >
    > If you have quite a lot of data, I would recommend MaxQDA over
    > nVivo. Admittedly, nVivo might ‘look’ more appealing, but MaxQDA
    > seemed more flexible and more geared towards larger datasets and
    > lots of importing and exporting between different applications.
    >
    > I hope you find this helpful. Happy to answer any follow-up questions.
    >
    > Best
    > Daniel
    >
    >
    >
    > Dr. Daniel Dauber
    > Assistant Professor
    >
    > The Centre for Applied Linguistics,
    > Social Sciences Building
    > University of Warwick, Coventry
    > CV4 7AL, UK
    >
    > Global Education Profiler (GE-P)
    > A diagnostic tool for internationalising universities
    > Web: globalpad.net/ge-p<http://globalpad.net/ge-p>
    >
    > Find me on:
    > warwick.ac.uk/danieldauber<http://warwick.ac.uk/danieldauber>
    > twitter.com/daniel_dauber<http://twitter.com/daniel_dauber>
    > uk.linkedin.com/in/danieldauber/<http://uk.linkedin.com/in/danieldauber/>
    > ssrn.com/author=1588580<http://ssrn.com/author=1588580>
    >
    >
    > On 2 November 2016 at 00:01:02, Mulyadi Robin
    > (mulyadi.robin@monash.edu<mailto:mulyadi.robin@monash.edu>) wrote:
    > Hi Jeanine,
    >
    > I have found NVivo to be extremely useful for text analysis. While
    > there is a slightly upward learning curve, the systematic layout and
    > workflow of the software make it relatively quick to adapt to.
    >
    > Another use I have found for it is to organize my literature reviews
    > through NVivo – the nodes of NVivo allows you to categorize direct
    > quotes, findings, empirical works etc.
    >
    > Further, as ascertained by others – the support from the QSR is
    > really great. I’ll also echo that Dr Pat Bazeley’s book is a great
    > resource for NVivo users.
    >
    > Best regards,
    > Mulyadi
    >
    > --
    > DR MULYADI ROBIN
    > Lecturer in Leadership and Management
    >
    > Monash Business School
    > Monash University
    > Level 6, Building N6.29, Caulfield Campus
    > 900 Dandenong Road
    > Caulfield East VIC 3145
    > Australia
    >
    > T: +61 3 9903 2635
    > E: mulyadi.robin@monash.edu<mailto:mulyadi.robin@monash.edu>
    > monash.edu<http://monash.edu/>
    >
    > CRICOS Provider 00008C/ 01857J
    > [cid:0DE4122D-7C27-42BA-ABAC-1E5648273100]
    >
    > We engage in the highest quality research and education to have a
    > positive impact on a changing world
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > From: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv
    > <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG> on behalf of Yvonne McNulty
    > <ymcnulty@EXPATRESEARCH.COM>
    > Reply-To: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG>
    > Date: Tuesday, 1 November 2016 at 7:20 pm
    > To: <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG>
    > Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] Question about text analytics software
    >
    > Hi Jeanine,
    > I’ve been using NVIVO for years, first during my doctoral studies.
    > I, too, find it incredibly user friendly, and the support from
    > Australia is first class. The texts mentioned below are very helpful.
    > I haven’t used SPSS as I haven’t felt the need to.
    > Hope that helps,
    >
    > Yvonne McNulty
    > SIM University
    > Singapore
    >
    >
    >
    > From: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv
    > <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG> on behalf of E Louise Alden
    > <e.alden@HOTMAIL.COM>
    > Reply-To: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG>
    > Date: Tuesday, 1 November 2016 at 2:45 AM
    > To: <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG>
    > Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] Question about text analytics software
    >
    >
    > Hi Jeanine,
    >
    > I can only speak to NVivo, but I have used it and trained others on
    > it for 13 years now and it has become not only much more user
    > friendly, but is covering a lot of ground in regards to types of
    > resource data it can handle. I highly recommend it. Even though
    > they are based in Australia, I found QSR very responsive and helpful
    > when I had a major dilemma (like how to upload data from two open
    > ended response fields from 700 participants). They also regularly
    > ask for feedback on how to help researchers and I've just found them
    > incredibly interested in what we need and how they can provide it.
    > I also highly recommend the NVivo books by Dr. Pat Bazeley she is a
    > guru of sorts on NVivo and her texts have saved me on many a
    > project. I also recommend the NVivo help group on LinkedIn, were
    > Dr. Bazeley will jump in to help researchers with NVivo queries.
    >
    >
    >
    > So I know that gives you nothing on SPSS, but for what it's worth, I
    > wanted to share my experience that NVivo is well supported and
    > useful for this kind of work.
    >
    >
    >
    > Elaine Alden, PhD.
    >
    > Program Chair, Sociology
    >
    > Ashford University
    >
    > ________________________________
    > From: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv
    > <OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG> on behalf of Jeanine Phippen
    > <jkandreassi@GMAIL.COM>
    > Sent: 31 October 2016 13:17
    > To: OB@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG
    > Subject: [OB-LIST] Question about text analytics software
    >
    > Colleagues
    >
    > I was wondering if anyone has any thoughts on SPSS Text Analytics
    > software (through SPSS Modeler Text Analytics program) vs NVIVO ?
    > From a first glance at manuals, NVIVO looks more user friendly, but
    > was wondering if anyone had experience with both that they could
    > share ?
    >
    > Thanks in advance
    >
    > Jeanine Andreassi, Ph.D.
    > Associate Professor, Sacred Heart University
    >
    >