Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  Need more studies for a meta-analytic path analysis

    Posted 02-02-2016 01:44

    Dear colleagues,

     

    I am working on a paper with a professor regarding testing a meta-analytic path model. There are six variables in the model. However, for some relationships, we do not have enough studies. We would greatly appreciate if you could provide us with published or unpublished studies that include the following relationships:

    1. Anxiety and problem-focused coping

    2. Worry and problem-focused coping

    3. Challenge stressors and threat appraisal

    4. Positive affect and problem-focused coping

     

    Best Regards,

    Pan


    ---

    Liyao Pan, M.A.

    Doctoral student

    Department of Management

    The University of Texas at San Antonio




  • 2.  Need more studies for a meta-analytic path analysis

    Posted 02-02-2016 08:50

    Pan,

     

    In many situations, like yours, it may not be possible to find studies to complete a targeted meta-analytically derived correlation matrix. As noted by Bergh et al. (in press, SMJ, listed below), possible solutions to this challenge include: "(1) search again for relevant studies based on the same and/or different search criteria; (2) contact other researchers to request correlation values; (3) conduct original primary-level studies; (4) replace some existing variables with conceptually similar 'surrogate' variables; (5) group specific constructs into broader construct(s) by deriving composite correlations; (6) use a two-stage structural equation modeling, which manages missing values automatically; (7) implement advanced data imputation techniques such as full information maximum likelihood; (8) use the average effect size across all non-missing effect sizes; or (9) rely on subject matter experts or expertise to estimate the value for the missing effect sizes." Bergh et al recommended the first three options as the most desirable because all of them involve using actual data without any conceptual or empirical manipulation. If none of the above possible solutions are available, the remaining option is to limit the scope of inquiry. For more detailed information on these issues, see:

     

    ·       Bergh, D. D., Aguinis, H., Heavey, C. Ketchen, D. J., Boyd, B. K., Su, P., Lau, C., & Joo, H. in press. Using meta-analytic structural equation modeling to advance strategic management research: Guidelines and an empirical illustration via the strategic leadership-performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal. doi: 10.1002/smj.2338 [available at http://mypage.iu.edu/~haguinis/pubs.html]

     

    I hope this helps!

    All the best,

     

    --Herman.

     

    Herman Aguinis

    John F. Mee Chair of Management

    Professor of Organizational Behavior and Human Resources

    Founding and Managing Director, Institute for Global Organizational Effectiveness

     

    Indiana University

    Kelley School of Business

    http://mypage.iu.edu/~haguinis/

     

     

    From: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv [mailto:OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU] On Behalf Of Liyao Pan
    Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 1:44 AM
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    Subject: [OB-LIST] Need more studies for a meta-analytic path analysis

     

    Dear colleagues,

     

    I am working on a paper with a professor regarding testing a meta-analytic path model. There are six variables in the model. However, for some relationships, we do not have enough studies. We would greatly appreciate if you could provide us with published or unpublished studies that include the following relationships:

    1. Anxiety and problem-focused coping

    2. Worry and problem-focused coping

    3. Challenge stressors and threat appraisal

    4. Positive affect and problem-focused coping

     

    Best Regards,

    Pan

     

    ---

    Liyao Pan, M.A.

    Doctoral student

    Department of Management

    The University of Texas at San Antonio