Discussion: View Thread

Expand all | Collapse all

Free access to latest Human Relations Special Issue: When it can be good to feel bad, and bad to feel good: Exploring asymmetries in workplace emotional outcomes

  • 1.  Free access to latest Human Relations Special Issue: When it can be good to feel bad, and bad to feel good: Exploring asymmetries in workplace emotional outcomes

    Posted 07-10-2014 06:31

    Please find attached the first article from our latest Human Relations Special Issue that may be of interest to you and enjoy free access for one month to all the articles and the podcast.

     

    Please feel free to forward this email to your colleagues in this research area.

     

     

    When it can be good to feel bad, and bad to feel good:

    Exploring asymmetries in workplace emotional outcomes

    Guest Editors: Dirk Lindebaum and Peter J Jordan

     

    When it can be good to feel bad, and bad to feel good: Exploring asymmetries in workplace emotional outcomes

    Dirk Lindebaum and Peter J Jordan

    Published online before print in Human Relations July 9, 2014 as doi:10.1177/0018726714535824

    http://hum.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/07/09/0018726714535824.full.pdf+html

     

    Understanding when leader negative emotional expression enhances follower performance: The moderating roles of follower personality traits and perceived leader power

    Nai-Wen Chi and Ta-Rui Ho

    Published online before print in Human Relations June 4, 2014, doi: 10.1177/0018726714526626

    http://hum.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/06/03/0018726714526626.full.pdf+html

     

    Emotional roulette? Symmetrical and asymmetrical emotion regulation outcomes from coworker interactions about positive and negative work events

    Constance Hadley

    Published online before print in Human Relations June 4, 2014, doi: 10.1177/0018726714529316

    http://hum.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/06/04/0018726714529316.full.pdf+html

     

    Transformation through tension: Dysfunction to performance (and vice versa) through negative affect in teams

    Rebecca Mitchell, Brendan Boyle, Vicki Parker, Michelle Giles, Pauline Joyce and Vico Chiang

    Published online before print in Human Relations May 21, 2014, doi: 10.1177/0018726714521645

    http://hum.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/05/19/0018726714521645.full.pdf+html

     

    Podcast interview: Rebecca Mitchell discusses her research into tension in the workplace and how this can sometimes be a good thing

    Posted online May 2014

    http://hwcdn.libsyn.com/p/b/4/d/b4d0ed78fb3fc03f/HumanRelations_Podcast_8_Tension_in_the_Workplace_FINAL.mp3?c_id=7220006&expiration=1403786615&hwt=20751ffa6c3e7bf09b7e46fdac7dbdc5

     

    'Why would you want to do that?': Defining emotional dirty work

    Robert McMurray and Jenna Ward

    Published online before print in Human Relations April 10, 2014, doi: 10.1177/0018726714525975

    http://hum.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/04/10/0018726714525975.full.pdf+html

     

    Understanding the positive and negative effects of emotional expressions in organizations: EASI does it

    Gerben A van Kleef

    Published online before print in Human Relations February 17, 2014, doi: 10.1177/0018726713510329

    http://hum.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/02/05/0018726713510329.full.pdf+html

     

     

    With best wishes,

     

    Claire Castle

    Managing Editor, Human Relations 

    Email: c.castle@tavinstitute.org

     

    Website: www.humanrelationsjournal.org

    OnlineFirst forthcoming articles: http://hum.sagepub.com/content/early/recent

    Submission guidance: http://www.tavinstitute.org/humanrelations/submit_paper.html

     

    Human Relations 2012 Impact Factor:
    2-year impact factor: 1.938

    5-year impact factor: 2.901

    Source: 2012 Journal Citation Reports® (Thomson Reuters, 2013)

     

     

     



    Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to


    The contents of this e-mail are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed.

    Any opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily those of the company.

    The Tavistock Institute accepts no responsibility for information, error or omissions in this e-mail, nor for its

    use or misuse, nor for any act committed or omitted in connection with this communication. If you have received

    this e-mail in error or if you are concerned about its contents please destroy it and contact the sender via e-mail return.

    ______________________________________________________________________
                      This email has been scanned by BlackSpider Mailcontrol.
    ______________________________________________________________________