Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  Group Exercise Needed - Two Way Communication

    Posted 07-02-2011 15:03
    I am looking for both a general and a specific exercise on two-way communication.  The specific one is something I used a number of years ago, but I cannot locate it nor a reference.
    The exercise involved a manager who is on a business trip to explain a new product.  The prototype "breaks" and she opens an envelope to find 4-5 pieces of paper in odd shapes. She calls the assistant manager who has a drawing of the prototype (a block T), and has to explain to him how to arrange the pieces to form the T. However, the dyad is limited to one way communication, the assistant manager can talk, but the manager can not ask questions or confirm.  Eventually, two way communication is restored, and at the end of the exercise, the differences between the two forms of communication are discussed.  The exercise is named for the fictitious product.

    Does this ring a bell? Does anyone have a reference to it?

    I am also looking for a general exercise that is similar to that: opportunities for one and two-way (or even just two-way) communication in dyads.  Ideally it can be scored.  Any suggestions are appreciated.

    Cordially,
    Kurt

    --
    *******************************************************
    Kurt Kraiger, Ph.D.
    Professor of Psychology
    Director, Ph.D. Program in I/O Psychology
    Director, MAIOP Program

    .
    Department of Psychology
    Campus Delivery 1876
    Colorado State University
    Fort Collins, CO 80523-1876
    (970) 491-6821
    .
    Skype: kurt.kraiger
    http://www.linkedin.com/in/kraiger
    Kurt.Kraiger@colostate.edu
    *****************************************************






  • 2.  Group Exercise Needed - Two Way Communication

    Posted 07-02-2011 18:32
    it sounds similar (without the tactile sense) to the one described in
    Harold Levitt's old (19658) OB Book, Managerial Psychology.

    that had two pictures made up of odd shapes -- one was communicated
    one-way, the other two way.

    hth
    m
    \

    Martin G. Evans
    Professor Emeritus
    Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto



    URL: www.rotman.utoronto.ca/~evans

    ,,, it is ultimately the faith and determination of the American People
    upon which this nation relies. It is ... the selflessness of workers who
    would rather cut their hours than see a friend lose their job.
    Barack H. Obama

    The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of
    those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have
    too little.
    Franklin D. Roosevelt

    ... had begun to consider the Government of the United States as a mere
    appendage to their own affairs. We know now that Government by organized
    money is just as dangerous as Government by organized mob.
    Never before in all our history have these forces been so united
    against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their
    hate for me - and I welcome their hatred.
    Franklin D. Roosevelt
    [When will Barack H. Obama quote this?]

    On 7/2/2011 3:03 PM, Kurt Kraiger wrote:
    > I am looking for both a general and a specific exercise on two-way
    > communication. The specific one is something I used a number of years
    > ago, but I cannot locate it nor a reference.
    > The exercise involved a manager who is on a business trip to explain a
    > new product. The prototype "breaks" and she opens an envelope to find
    > 4-5 pieces of paper in odd shapes. She calls the assistant manager who
    > has a drawing of the prototype (a block T), and has to explain to him
    > how to arrange the pieces to form the T. However, the dyad is limited to
    > one way communication, the assistant manager can talk, but the manager
    > can not ask questions or confirm. Eventually, two way communication is
    > restored, and at the end of the exercise, the differences between the
    > two forms of communication are discussed. The exercise is named for the
    > fictitious product.
    >
    > Does this ring a bell? Does anyone have a reference to it?
    >
    > I am also looking for a general exercise that is similar to that:
    > opportunities for one and two-way (or even just two-way) communication
    > in dyads. Ideally it can be scored. Any suggestions are appreciated.
    >
    > Cordially,
    > Kurt
    >
    > --
    > *******************************************************
    > Kurt Kraiger, Ph.D.
    > Professor of Psychology
    > Director, Ph.D. Program in I/O Psychology
    > Director, MAIOP Program
    >
    > .
    > Department of Psychology
    > Campus Delivery 1876
    > Colorado State University
    > Fort Collins, CO 80523-1876
    > (970) 491-6821
    > .
    > Skype: kurt.kraiger
    > http://www.linkedin.com/in/kraiger
    > Kurt.Kraiger@colostate.edu <mailto:Kurt.Kraiger@colostate.edu>
    > *****************************************************
    >
    >
    >
    >


  • 3.  Group Exercise Needed - Two Way Communication

    Posted 07-02-2011 23:46
    I have seen another one called Jet Fighter that involves sitting people in a
    t-shape or Block-I shape formation, where they need to communicate which
    type symbols they hold (e.g. #, &, @, etc.) so that the team eventually
    knows who holds what. I may be able to get this to you when I return to the
    office in about a week.

    Roy Lewicki


    On 7/2/11 6:31 PM, "Martin Evans" <martin.evans@UTORONTO.CA> wrote:

    > it sounds similar (without the tactile sense) to the one described in
    > Harold Levitt's old (19658) OB Book, Managerial Psychology.
    >
    > that had two pictures made up of odd shapes -- one was communicated
    > one-way, the other two way.
    >
    > hth
    > m
    > \
    >
    > Martin G. Evans
    > Professor Emeritus
    > Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto
    >
    >
    >
    > URL: www.rotman.utoronto.ca/~evans
    >
    > ,,, it is ultimately the faith and determination of the American People
    > upon which this nation relies. It is ... the selflessness of workers who
    > would rather cut their hours than see a friend lose their job.
    > Barack H. Obama
    >
    > The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of
    > those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have
    > too little.
    > Franklin D. Roosevelt
    >
    > ... had begun to consider the Government of the United States as a mere
    > appendage to their own affairs. We know now that Government by organized
    > money is just as dangerous as Government by organized mob.
    > Never before in all our history have these forces been so united
    > against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their
    > hate for me - and I welcome their hatred.
    > Franklin D. Roosevelt
    > [When will Barack H. Obama quote this?]
    >
    > On 7/2/2011 3:03 PM, Kurt Kraiger wrote:
    >> I am looking for both a general and a specific exercise on two-way
    >> communication. The specific one is something I used a number of years
    >> ago, but I cannot locate it nor a reference.
    >> The exercise involved a manager who is on a business trip to explain a
    >> new product. The prototype "breaks" and she opens an envelope to find
    >> 4-5 pieces of paper in odd shapes. She calls the assistant manager who
    >> has a drawing of the prototype (a block T), and has to explain to him
    >> how to arrange the pieces to form the T. However, the dyad is limited to
    >> one way communication, the assistant manager can talk, but the manager
    >> can not ask questions or confirm. Eventually, two way communication is
    >> restored, and at the end of the exercise, the differences between the
    >> two forms of communication are discussed. The exercise is named for the
    >> fictitious product.
    >>
    >> Does this ring a bell? Does anyone have a reference to it?
    >>
    >> I am also looking for a general exercise that is similar to that:
    >> opportunities for one and two-way (or even just two-way) communication
    >> in dyads. Ideally it can be scored. Any suggestions are appreciated.
    >>
    >> Cordially,
    >> Kurt
    >>
    >> --
    >> *******************************************************
    >> Kurt Kraiger, Ph.D.
    >> Professor of Psychology
    >> Director, Ph.D. Program in I/O Psychology
    >> Director, MAIOP Program
    >>
    >> .
    >> Department of Psychology
    >> Campus Delivery 1876
    >> Colorado State University
    >> Fort Collins, CO 80523-1876
    >> (970) 491-6821
    >> .
    >> Skype: kurt.kraiger
    >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/kraiger
    >> Kurt.Kraiger@colostate.edu <mailto:Kurt.Kraiger@colostate.edu>
    >> *****************************************************
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>