Dear All, Ray Aldag and Sally Fuller (Psy Bul, 1993?) assessed the validity of Janis GT model, and found it less than convincing. They suggested some alternatives. It might be helpful to go back and look at their article for ideas. Also, tangentially, in the back of my memory, I think that maybe Barry Staw and ? looked at how to overcome Commitment to a Course of Action and as I remember the only thing that worked was forcing the people involved to go back over their decision and justify each step in the DM process. As I recall, most CCA errors were the result of skipping a step.
Kim Boal
________________________________________
From: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv [
OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU] On Behalf Of Guihyun Park [
parkguih@GMAIL.COM]
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 11:28 PM
To:
OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] Team member solutions to groupthink
The problem with the devil's advocate method is that it tends to scarifies team satisfaction because it can cause stress for team members (especially for those who are selected as the devil's advocate) and create unnatural friction among team members (Van Dyne & Saavedra, 1996).
In my recent paper, we talked about having a high level of team learning goal orientation as an alternative to the devil's advocate method. When teams have a high learning goal orientation, minority opinion holders were more likely to speak up their different opinions and teams had a better team discussion, which in turn, led to higher team decision quality and team satisfaction (J Appl Psychol. 2010 Sep;95(5):824-33).
You can increase team's learning goal orientation by giving teams some instructions on values of learning from each others, and values of learning from making mistakes.
Guihyun Park
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 4:02 AM, Bonnie Garson <
bonniegarson@yahoo.com<mailto:
bonniegarson@yahoo.com>> wrote:
Why not have team members from the other teams come in to be critical observers and give feedback. This would be a full circle lesson!
Dr. Bonnie Garson
--- On Fri, 9/17/10, Robert McNamee <
rmcnamee@ANDROMEDA.RUTGERS.EDU<mailto:
rmcnamee@ANDROMEDA.RUTGERS.EDU>> wrote:
From: Robert McNamee <
rmcnamee@ANDROMEDA.RUTGERS.EDU<mailto:
rmcnamee@ANDROMEDA.RUTGERS.EDU>>
Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] Team member solutions to groupthink
To:
OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU<mailto:
OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU>
Date: Friday, September 17, 2010, 5:40 PM
What about suggesting that some external stakeholders be engaged as a part
of the decision making process (e.g., customers, suppliers, other business
units, other functional areas, other relevant experts from outside the
group, etc... -- individuals from any groups that increase the diversity of
perspectives being considered)?
Robert C. McNamee
Rutgers Business School
Department of Management and Global Business
Phone: 201-792-2695
Mobile: 201-674-6137
Webpage:
http://mcnameephd.pbworks.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv
[mailto:
OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU<http://us.mc319.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=
OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU>] On Behalf Of Clawson, Jim
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 1:25 PM
To:
OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU<http://us.mc319.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=
OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] Team member solutions to groupthink
One option would be to get them to watch "12 Angry Men" if possible
(unlikely) and discuss. Another would be to have them read "Dialogue" from
Organizational Dynamics issue on the same about how to get group ideas out
from the silence and use the techniques described in there. But if the
leader is determined to get his/her solution, these won't help. Can you
identify the consequences of the proposed actions and present them clearly?
If not, maybe it's just a matter of opinion?
Jim
James G. S. Clawson
Johnson & Higgins Professor of Business Administration
Tel: 434 924-7488
Fax: 434 243-7680
Mail: Box 6550, Charlottesville, VA 22906
Packages: 100 Darden Boulevard, Charlottesville, VA 22903
Web:
http://faculty.darden.virginia.edu/Clawsonj
-----Original Message-----
From: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv
[mailto:
OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU<http://us.mc319.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=
OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU>] On Behalf Of Ho, Violet
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 8:54 AM
To:
OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU<http://us.mc319.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=
OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU>
Subject: [OB-LIST] Team member solutions to groupthink
Dear members,
One of my MBA students recently asked me about what he as an individual team
member (not in a leadership position) can do to curb or prevent groupthink
in his work team, particularly when the boss/leader has expressed a strong
preference for a particular decision. While I'm aware of the more commonly
prescribed solutions that deal with the leader's role and the use of devil's
advocate, these typically require action or intervention by someone in
power. If that leader himself/herself is perpetuating groupthink, what can
a regular team member do without offending the boss or jeopardizing his own
career? Any advice or insights would be much appreciated.
Many thanks,
Violet
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Violet Ho
Associate Professor
Robins School of Business
University of Richmond
28 Westhampton Way
Richmond, VA 23173
Tel: (804) 289-8567
--
Guihyun Park
Assistant Professor of Psychology
School of Social Sciences
Singapore Management University
gracepark@smu.edu.sg<mailto:
gracepark@smu.edu.sg>