Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

    Posted 06-25-2013 12:16

    Dear Colleagues,

     

    I am interested in using this survey (Rokeach) with millennial business students in order to see if their values change over a period of time (years). 

     

    For those of you that are familiar with this survey, what are your thoughts on it? 

     

    What other value-based survey  tools would you recommend?

     

    Many thank, Scott

     

    Join the conversation on Twitter: @ScottatDal

    Connect with me on LinkedIn:  http://ca.linkedin.com/in/shift

     

    Scott Comber PhD

    Assistant Professor

    Rowe School of Business, Dalhousie University

    Kenneth C. Rowe Management Building

    6100 University Avenue, Room  4112

    Halifax, Nova Scotia  B3H 3J5

    voice: 902.494.7820

     

     



  • 2.  Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

    Posted 06-25-2013 14:13
    Hi Scott,

    I have been studying the values and work values of different generations for over a decade and I have some suggestions for you.  Actually, my research colleague is your colleague Ed Ng.  You may want to chat with him about what we've done regarding work values of the Millennials and other generations.

    I would suggest that the Rokeach value survey has been superseded in the past 20 years by the Schwartz Value Survey.  The SVS had been studied in a large number of countries and has very strong reliability.  It breaks down the value domain very predictably into 10 value types that form 4 superordinate domains.  It's much more theoretically and empirically robust that the Rokeach.  Also, because the Rokeach is a ranking instrument, it makes it less amenable to analysis than a rating measure like the SVS.  You can certainly compare rankings at time 1 and time 2, but there are a host of issues with rank-order correlations that might give you pause.

    If you're interested in studying work values as opposed to just  general values, I have an instrument that I have developed that has been used in a number of international studies of Millennials.

    I'm happy to talk further if you're interested.

    Sean Lyons
    University of Guelph

    From: "Scott Comber" <Scott.Comber@DAL.CA>
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:15:59 PM
    Subject: [OB-LIST] Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

    Dear Colleagues,

     

    I am interested in using this survey (Rokeach) with millennial business students in order to see if their values change over a period of time (years). 

     

    For those of you that are familiar with this survey, what are your thoughts on it? 

     

    What other value-based survey  tools would you recommend?

     

    Many thank, Scott

     

    Join the conversation on Twitter: @ScottatDal

    Connect with me on LinkedIn:  http://ca.linkedin.com/in/shift

     

    Scott Comber PhD

    Assistant Professor

    Rowe School of Business, Dalhousie University

    Kenneth C. Rowe Management Building

    6100 University Avenue, Room  4112

    Halifax, Nova Scotia  B3H 3J5

    voice: 902.494.7820

     

     




  • 3.  Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

    Posted 06-25-2013 15:53
    See:





    Sent from my mobile device

    On Jun 25, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Sean Lyons <slyons01@UOGUELPH.CA> wrote:

    Hi Scott,

    I have been studying the values and work values of different generations for over a decade and I have some suggestions for you.  Actually, my research colleague is your colleague Ed Ng.  You may want to chat with him about what we've done regarding work values of the Millennials and other generations.

    I would suggest that the Rokeach value survey has been superseded in the past 20 years by the Schwartz Value Survey.  The SVS had been studied in a large number of countries and has very strong reliability.  It breaks down the value domain very predictably into 10 value types that form 4 superordinate domains.  It's much more theoretically and empirically robust that the Rokeach.  Also, because the Rokeach is a ranking instrument, it makes it less amenable to analysis than a rating measure like the SVS.  You can certainly compare rankings at time 1 and time 2, but there are a host of issues with rank-order correlations that might give you pause.

    If you're interested in studying work values as opposed to just  general values, I have an instrument that I have developed that has been used in a number of international studies of Millennials.

    I'm happy to talk further if you're interested.

    Sean Lyons
    University of Guelph

    From: "Scott Comber" <Scott.Comber@DAL.CA>
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:15:59 PM
    Subject: [OB-LIST] Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

    Dear Colleagues,

     

    I am interested in using this survey (Rokeach) with millennial business students in order to see if their values change over a period of time (years). 

     

    For those of you that are familiar with this survey, what are your thoughts on it? 

     

    What other value-based survey  tools would you recommend?

     

    Many thank, Scott

     

    Join the conversation on Twitter: @ScottatDal

    Connect with me on LinkedIn:  http://ca.linkedin.com/in/shift

     

    <image003.jpg>

    Scott Comber PhD

    Assistant Professor

    Rowe School of Business, Dalhousie University

    Kenneth C. Rowe Management Building

    6100 University Avenue, Room  4112

    Halifax, Nova Scotia  B3H 3J5

    voice: 902.494.7820

     

     




  • 4.  Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

    Posted 06-25-2013 16:47

    Scott,

    You should understand that values that are measured using a normative methodology (as employed in the SVS) differ in a number of way from values that are measured using an ipsative methodology (as used in the Rokeach and other measures). Liz Ravlin and I described this distinction in a 1998 review, which I've listed below.

    Bruce

     

    Meglino, B. M. & Ravlin, E. C. (1998). Individual values in organizations: Concepts, controversies, and research. Journal of Management, 24, 351-389.

     

     

    Bruce M. Meglino
    Darla Moore School of Business
    University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208
    Voice: 803.777-5970; Fax: 803.777-6876
    http://moore.sc.edu/facultyresearch/faculty.aspx?faculty_id=71

     

     

    From: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv [mailto:OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU] On Behalf Of Sean Lyons
    Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 2:13 PM
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

     

    Hi Scott,

     

    I have been studying the values and work values of different generations for over a decade and I have some suggestions for you.  Actually, my research colleague is your colleague Ed Ng.  You may want to chat with him about what we've done regarding work values of the Millennials and other generations.

     

    I would suggest that the Rokeach value survey has been superseded in the past 20 years by the Schwartz Value Survey.  The SVS had been studied in a large number of countries and has very strong reliability.  It breaks down the value domain very predictably into 10 value types that form 4 superordinate domains.  It's much more theoretically and empirically robust that the Rokeach.  Also, because the Rokeach is a ranking instrument, it makes it less amenable to analysis than a rating measure like the SVS.  You can certainly compare rankings at time 1 and time 2, but there are a host of issues with rank-order correlations that might give you pause.

     

    If you're interested in studying work values as opposed to just  general values, I have an instrument that I have developed that has been used in a number of international studies of Millennials.

     

    I'm happy to talk further if you're interested.

     

    Sean Lyons

    University of Guelph

    From: "Scott Comber" <Scott.Comber@DAL.CA>
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:15:59 PM
    Subject: [OB-LIST] Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

    Dear Colleagues,

     

    I am interested in using this survey (Rokeach) with millennial business students in order to see if their values change over a period of time (years). 

     

    For those of you that are familiar with this survey, what are your thoughts on it? 

     

    What other value-based survey  tools would you recommend?

     

    Many thank, Scott

     

    Join the conversation on Twitter: @ScottatDal

    Connect with me on LinkedIn:  http://ca.linkedin.com/in/shift

     

    Scott Comber PhD

    Assistant Professor

    Rowe School of Business, Dalhousie University

    Kenneth C. Rowe Management Building

    6100 University Avenue, Room  4112

    Halifax, Nova Scotia  B3H 3J5

    voice: 902.494.7820

     

     

     



  • 5.  Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

    Posted 06-26-2013 10:40
    Scott,
    I have a personal preference for the Shalom Schwartz value universe.

    This is the only coherent value system which fits the conditions of a normative personality (i.e. an organisation into which individuals are embedded).
    The theoretical foundations of a normative personality agency theory you can find in this working paper:

    Yolles, Maurice and Fink, Gerhard , An Introduction to Mindset Agency Theory (April 30, 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2272169 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2272169.

    Best wishes
    Gerhard Fink



    Meglino, Bruce schrieb:
    0BE25E21CCAC0D40A84CE52B96C905EC7EF4EE9E41@CODMSBOITS04.Moore.SC.Edu" type="cite">

    Scott,

    You should understand that values that are measured using a normative methodology (as employed in the SVS) differ in a number of way from values that are measured using an ipsative methodology (as used in the Rokeach and other measures). Liz Ravlin and I described this distinction in a 1998 review, which I've listed below.

    Bruce

     

    Meglino, B. M. & Ravlin, E. C. (1998). Individual values in organizations: Concepts, controversies, and research. Journal of Management, 24, 351-389.

     

     

    Bruce M. Meglino
    Darla Moore School of Business
    University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208
    Voice: 803.777-5970; Fax: 803.777-6876
    http://moore.sc.edu/facultyresearch/faculty.aspx?faculty_id=71

     

     

    From: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv [mailto:OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU] On Behalf Of Sean Lyons
    Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 2:13 PM
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

     

    Hi Scott,

     

    I have been studying the values and work values of different generations for over a decade and I have some suggestions for you.  Actually, my research colleague is your colleague Ed Ng.  You may want to chat with him about what we've done regarding work values of the Millennials and other generations.

     

    I would suggest that the Rokeach value survey has been superseded in the past 20 years by the Schwartz Value Survey.  The SVS had been studied in a large number of countries and has very strong reliability.  It breaks down the value domain very predictably into 10 value types that form 4 superordinate domains.  It's much more theoretically and empirically robust that the Rokeach.  Also, because the Rokeach is a ranking instrument, it makes it less amenable to analysis than a rating measure like the SVS.  You can certainly compare rankings at time 1 and time 2, but there are a host of issues with rank-order correlations that might give you pause.

     

    If you're interested in studying work values as opposed to just  general values, I have an instrument that I have developed that has been used in a number of international studies of Millennials.

     

    I'm happy to talk further if you're interested.

     

    Sean Lyons

    University of Guelph

    From: "Scott Comber" <Scott.Comber@DAL.CA>
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:15:59 PM
    Subject: [OB-LIST] Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

    Dear Colleagues,

     

    I am interested in using this survey (Rokeach) with millennial business students in order to see if their values change over a period of time (years). 

     

    For those of you that are familiar with this survey, what are your thoughts on it? 

     

    What other value-based survey  tools would you recommend?

     

    Many thank, Scott

     

    Join the conversation on Twitter: @ScottatDal

    Connect with me on LinkedIn:  http://ca.linkedin.com/in/shift

     

    Scott Comber PhD

    Assistant Professor

    Rowe School of Business, Dalhousie University

    Kenneth C. Rowe Management Building

    6100 University Avenue, Room  4112

    Halifax, Nova Scotia  B3H 3J5

    voice: 902.494.7820

     

     

     


    --

    Gerhard Fink
    E-Mail: gerhard.fink@wu.ac.at

     

    NEW:

    Fink, Gerhard , Yolles, Maurice and Dauber, Daniel,

    The Role of Managerial and Organizational Intelligences (May 21, 2013).

    Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2267750

     

    Please take a look at

    Dauber, D., Fink, G. and Yolles, M. (2012)

    Configuration Model of Organizational Culture

    Sage Open 2012, so far 11,700 downloads from

    http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/2/1/2158244012441482

     

    Please view my research on my Author pages:

    http://ssrn.com/author=92836

    http://wuvienna.academia.edu/GerhardFink

     



  • 6.  Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

    Posted 06-29-2013 05:17
    The SVS has been superseded by the PVQ in terms of reliability.

    See:



    Ralston, D.A., Egri, C.P., Reynaud, E., Srinivasan, N., Furrer, O., Brock, D., Alas, R., Wangenheim, F., Darder, F.L., Mellahi, K., Kuo, C., Potocan, V., Mockaitis, A.I., Szabo, E., Gutiérrez, J.R., Pekerti, A., Butt, A., Palmer, I., Naoumova, I., Lenartowicz, T., Starkus, A., Thanh, H.V., Dalgic, T., Molteni, M., de la Garza Carranza, M.T., Maignan, I., Castro, F.B., Moon, Y-L., Terpstra-Tong, J., Dabic, M., Li, Y., Danis, W., Kangasniemi, M., Ansari, M., Riddle, L., Milton, L., Hallinger, P., Elenkov, D., Girson, I., Gelbuda, M., Ramburuth, P., Casado, T., Rossi, A.M., Richards, M., Van Deusen, C., Fu, P.P., Wan, P.M.K., Tang, M., Lee, C-H., Chia, H-B., Fan, Y., & Wallace, A.(2011). A 21st century assessment of values across the global workforce. Journal of Business Ethics, 104: 1-31.

     
    Romie Frederick Littrell, PhD, FIAIR
    Editor, AIB Insights; International Management Area Editor, International Journal of Emerging Markets
    AUT Business School, Tel. extension 5805, Mail stop B-31

    From: Shaun Hansen <sdhphd@GMAIL.COM>
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    Sent: Wednesday, 26 June 2013, 7:53
    Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

    See:





    Sent from my mobile device

    On Jun 25, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Sean Lyons <slyons01@UOGUELPH.CA> wrote:

    Hi Scott,

    I have been studying the values and work values of different generations for over a decade and I have some suggestions for you.  Actually, my research colleague is your colleague Ed Ng.  You may want to chat with him about what we've done regarding work values of the Millennials and other generations.

    I would suggest that the Rokeach value survey has been superseded in the past 20 years by the Schwartz Value Survey.  The SVS had been studied in a large number of countries and has very strong reliability.  It breaks down the value domain very predictably into 10 value types that form 4 superordinate domains.  It's much more theoretically and empirically robust that the Rokeach.  Also, because the Rokeach is a ranking instrument, it makes it less amenable to analysis than a rating measure like the SVS.  You can certainly compare rankings at time 1 and time 2, but there are a host of issues with rank-order correlations that might give you pause.

    If you're interested in studying work values as opposed to just  general values, I have an instrument that I have developed that has been used in a number of international studies of Millennials.

    I'm happy to talk further if you're interested.

    Sean Lyons
    University of Guelph

    From: "Scott Comber" <Scott.Comber@DAL.CA>
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:15:59 PM
    Subject: [OB-LIST] Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

    Dear Colleagues,
     
    I am interested in using this survey (Rokeach) with millennial business students in order to see if their values change over a period of time (years). 
     
    For those of you that are familiar with this survey, what are your thoughts on it? 
     
    What other value-based survey  tools would you recommend?
     
    Many thank, Scott
     
    Join the conversation on Twitter: @ScottatDal
    Connect with me on LinkedIn:  http://ca.linkedin.com/in/shift
     
    <image003.jpg>
    Scott Comber PhD
    Assistant Professor
    Rowe School of Business, Dalhousie University
    Kenneth C. Rowe Management Building
    6100 University Avenue, Room  4112
    Halifax, Nova Scotia  B3H 3J5
    voice: 902.494.7820
     
     





  • 7.  Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

    Posted 06-29-2013 05:18
    And also see:
    Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of cross-cultural Psychology, 32(5), 519-542.


     
    Romie Frederick Littrell, PhD, FIAIR
    Editor, AIB Insights; International Management Area Editor, International Journal of Emerging Markets
    AUT Business School, Tel. extension 5805, Mail stop B-31

    From: Romie Littrell <littrellaom@yahoo.co.nz>
    To: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv <OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU>
    Sent: Saturday, 29 June 2013, 21:17
    Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

    The SVS has been superseded by the PVQ in terms of reliability.

    See:



    Ralston, D.A., Egri, C.P., Reynaud, E., Srinivasan, N., Furrer, O., Brock, D., Alas, R., Wangenheim, F., Darder, F.L., Mellahi, K., Kuo, C., Potocan, V., Mockaitis, A.I., Szabo, E., Gutiérrez, J.R., Pekerti, A., Butt, A., Palmer, I., Naoumova, I., Lenartowicz, T., Starkus, A., Thanh, H.V., Dalgic, T., Molteni, M., de la Garza Carranza, M.T., Maignan, I., Castro, F.B., Moon, Y-L., Terpstra-Tong, J., Dabic, M., Li, Y., Danis, W., Kangasniemi, M., Ansari, M., Riddle, L., Milton, L., Hallinger, P., Elenkov, D., Girson, I., Gelbuda, M., Ramburuth, P., Casado, T., Rossi, A.M., Richards, M., Van Deusen, C., Fu, P.P., Wan, P.M.K., Tang, M., Lee, C-H., Chia, H-B., Fan, Y., & Wallace, A.(2011). A 21st century assessment of values across the global workforce. Journal of Business Ethics, 104: 1-31.

     
    Romie Frederick Littrell, PhD, FIAIR
    Editor, AIB Insights; International Management Area Editor, International Journal of Emerging Markets
    AUT Business School, Tel. extension 5805, Mail stop B-31

    From: Shaun Hansen <sdhphd@GMAIL.COM>
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    Sent: Wednesday, 26 June 2013, 7:53
    Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

    See:





    Sent from my mobile device

    On Jun 25, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Sean Lyons <slyons01@UOGUELPH.CA> wrote:

    Hi Scott,

    I have been studying the values and work values of different generations for over a decade and I have some suggestions for you.  Actually, my research colleague is your colleague Ed Ng.  You may want to chat with him about what we've done regarding work values of the Millennials and other generations.

    I would suggest that the Rokeach value survey has been superseded in the past 20 years by the Schwartz Value Survey.  The SVS had been studied in a large number of countries and has very strong reliability.  It breaks down the value domain very predictably into 10 value types that form 4 superordinate domains.  It's much more theoretically and empirically robust that the Rokeach.  Also, because the Rokeach is a ranking instrument, it makes it less amenable to analysis than a rating measure like the SVS.  You can certainly compare rankings at time 1 and time 2, but there are a host of issues with rank-order correlations that might give you pause.

    If you're interested in studying work values as opposed to just  general values, I have an instrument that I have developed that has been used in a number of international studies of Millennials.

    I'm happy to talk further if you're interested.

    Sean Lyons
    University of Guelph

    From: "Scott Comber" <Scott.Comber@DAL.CA>
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:15:59 PM
    Subject: [OB-LIST] Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

    Dear Colleagues,
     
    I am interested in using this survey (Rokeach) with millennial business students in order to see if their values change over a period of time (years). 
     
    For those of you that are familiar with this survey, what are your thoughts on it? 
     
    What other value-based survey  tools would you recommend?
     
    Many thank, Scott
     
    Join the conversation on Twitter: @ScottatDal
    Connect with me on LinkedIn:  http://ca.linkedin.com/in/shift
     
    <image003.jpg>
    Scott Comber PhD
    Assistant Professor
    Rowe School of Business, Dalhousie University
    Kenneth C. Rowe Management Building
    6100 University Avenue, Room  4112
    Halifax, Nova Scotia  B3H 3J5
    voice: 902.494.7820
     
     







  • 8.  Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

    Posted 06-29-2013 11:47

    If any of you need some detailed information about the SVS or PVQ, do not hesitate to contact Shalom Schwartz directly.

    In the past I did so a number of times: he always answered promptly, was extremely pleasant and helpful; his answers and advices were extremely useful...

     

    Isabelle WALSH, PhD

    Associate Professor

    Facilitator of the MPW (Managing in a Pluricultural World) Research Group 
    Tel. : +33 (0)661195809
    www.rouenbs.fr

    http://www.rouenbs.fr/fr/corps-professoral/les-departements-pedagogiques/langues-cultures-et-societe/1433?L=iwl@first


     

     

    De : Organizational Behavior Division Listserv [mailto:OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU] De la part de Romie Littrell
    Envoyé : Saturday, June 29, 2013 11:18 AM
    À : OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    Objet : Re: [OB-LIST] Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

     

    And also see:

    Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of cross-cultural Psychology, 32(5), 519-542.

     

     

     

    Romie Frederick Littrell, PhD, FIAIR
    Editor, AIB Insights; International Management Area Editor, International Journal of Emerging Markets
    AUT Business School, Tel. extension 5805, Mail stop B-31

     

    From: Romie Littrell <littrellaom@yahoo.co.nz>
    To: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv <OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU>
    Sent: Saturday, 29 June 2013, 21:17
    Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

     

    The SVS has been superseded by the PVQ in terms of reliability.

    See:



    Ralston, D.A., Egri, C.P., Reynaud, E., Srinivasan, N., Furrer, O., Brock, D., Alas, R., Wangenheim, F., Darder, F.L., Mellahi, K., Kuo, C., Potocan, V., Mockaitis, A.I., Szabo, E., Gutiérrez, J.R., Pekerti, A., Butt, A., Palmer, I., Naoumova, I., Lenartowicz, T., Starkus, A., Thanh, H.V., Dalgic, T., Molteni, M., de la Garza Carranza, M.T., Maignan, I., Castro, F.B., Moon, Y-L., Terpstra-Tong, J., Dabic, M., Li, Y., Danis, W., Kangasniemi, M., Ansari, M., Riddle, L., Milton, L., Hallinger, P., Elenkov, D., Girson, I., Gelbuda, M., Ramburuth, P., Casado, T., Rossi, A.M., Richards, M., Van Deusen, C., Fu, P.P., Wan, P.M.K., Tang, M., Lee, C-H., Chia, H-B., Fan, Y., & Wallace, A.(2011). A 21st century assessment of values across the global workforce. Journal of Business Ethics, 104: 1-31.

     

     

    Romie Frederick Littrell, PhD, FIAIR
    Editor, AIB Insights; International Management Area Editor, International Journal of Emerging Markets
    AUT Business School, Tel. extension 5805, Mail stop B-31

     

    From: Shaun Hansen <sdhphd@GMAIL.COM>
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    Sent: Wednesday, 26 June 2013, 7:53
    Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

     

    See:

     

     

     

     

    Sent from my mobile device

     

     


    On Jun 25, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Sean Lyons <slyons01@UOGUELPH.CA> wrote:

    Hi Scott,

     

    I have been studying the values and work values of different generations for over a decade and I have some suggestions for you.  Actually, my research colleague is your colleague Ed Ng.  You may want to chat with him about what we've done regarding work values of the Millennials and other generations.

     

    I would suggest that the Rokeach value survey has been superseded in the past 20 years by the Schwartz Value Survey.  The SVS had been studied in a large number of countries and has very strong reliability.  It breaks down the value domain very predictably into 10 value types that form 4 superordinate domains.  It's much more theoretically and empirically robust that the Rokeach.  Also, because the Rokeach is a ranking instrument, it makes it less amenable to analysis than a rating measure like the SVS.  You can certainly compare rankings at time 1 and time 2, but there are a host of issues with rank-order correlations that might give you pause.

     

    If you're interested in studying work values as opposed to just  general values, I have an instrument that I have developed that has been used in a number of international studies of Millennials.

     

    I'm happy to talk further if you're interested.

     

    Sean Lyons

    University of Guelph

    From: "Scott Comber" <Scott.Comber@DAL.CA>
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:15:59 PM
    Subject: [OB-LIST] Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

    Dear Colleagues,

     

    I am interested in using this survey (Rokeach) with millennial business students in order to see if their values change over a period of time (years). 

     

    For those of you that are familiar with this survey, what are your thoughts on it? 

     

    What other value-based survey  tools would you recommend?

     

    Many thank, Scott

     

    Join the conversation on Twitter: @ScottatDal

    Connect with me on LinkedIn:  http://ca.linkedin.com/in/shift

     

    <image003.jpg>

    Scott Comber PhD

    Assistant Professor

    Rowe School of Business, Dalhousie University

    Kenneth C. Rowe Management Building

    6100 University Avenue, Room  4112

    Halifax, Nova Scotia  B3H 3J5

    voice: 902.494.7820

     

     

     

     

     



  • 9.  Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

    Posted 06-29-2013 12:08
    For those interested in the PVQ, an updated version (the PVQ5X), measuring a refined 19-factor values domain is provided (including items) in:

    Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., ... & Konty, M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 103(4), Oct 2012, 663-688.

    Sean Lyons, PhD
    www.gencareershift.ca
    Department of Business
    College of Management and Economics
    University of Guelph
    50 Stone Road East
    Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
    Canada
    Fax: (519) 824-3087

    From: "Romie Littrell" <littrellaom@YAHOO.CO.NZ>
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 5:17:54 AM
    Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

    And also see:
    Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of cross-cultural Psychology, 32(5), 519-542.


     
    Romie Frederick Littrell, PhD, FIAIR
    Editor, AIB Insights; International Management Area Editor, International Journal of Emerging Markets
    AUT Business School, Tel. extension 5805, Mail stop B-31

    From: Romie Littrell <littrellaom@yahoo.co.nz>
    To: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv <OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU>
    Sent: Saturday, 29 June 2013, 21:17
    Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

    The SVS has been superseded by the PVQ in terms of reliability.

    See:



    Ralston, D.A., Egri, C.P., Reynaud, E., Srinivasan, N., Furrer, O., Brock, D., Alas, R., Wangenheim, F., Darder, F.L., Mellahi, K., Kuo, C., Potocan, V., Mockaitis, A.I., Szabo, E., Gutiérrez, J.R., Pekerti, A., Butt, A., Palmer, I., Naoumova, I., Lenartowicz, T., Starkus, A., Thanh, H.V., Dalgic, T., Molteni, M., de la Garza Carranza, M.T., Maignan, I., Castro, F.B., Moon, Y-L., Terpstra-Tong, J., Dabic, M., Li, Y., Danis, W., Kangasniemi, M., Ansari, M., Riddle, L., Milton, L., Hallinger, P., Elenkov, D., Girson, I., Gelbuda, M., Ramburuth, P., Casado, T., Rossi, A.M., Richards, M., Van Deusen, C., Fu, P.P., Wan, P.M.K., Tang, M., Lee, C-H., Chia, H-B., Fan, Y., & Wallace, A.(2011). A 21st century assessment of values across the global workforce. Journal of Business Ethics, 104: 1-31.

     
    Romie Frederick Littrell, PhD, FIAIR
    Editor, AIB Insights; International Management Area Editor, International Journal of Emerging Markets
    AUT Business School, Tel. extension 5805, Mail stop B-31

    From: Shaun Hansen <sdhphd@GMAIL.COM>
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    Sent: Wednesday, 26 June 2013, 7:53
    Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

    See:





    Sent from my mobile device

    On Jun 25, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Sean Lyons <slyons01@UOGUELPH.CA> wrote:

    Hi Scott,

    I have been studying the values and work values of different generations for over a decade and I have some suggestions for you.  Actually, my research colleague is your colleague Ed Ng.  You may want to chat with him about what we've done regarding work values of the Millennials and other generations.

    I would suggest that the Rokeach value survey has been superseded in the past 20 years by the Schwartz Value Survey.  The SVS had been studied in a large number of countries and has very strong reliability.  It breaks down the value domain very predictably into 10 value types that form 4 superordinate domains.  It's much more theoretically and empirically robust that the Rokeach.  Also, because the Rokeach is a ranking instrument, it makes it less amenable to analysis than a rating measure like the SVS.  You can certainly compare rankings at time 1 and time 2, but there are a host of issues with rank-order correlations that might give you pause.

    If you're interested in studying work values as opposed to just  general values, I have an instrument that I have developed that has been used in a number of international studies of Millennials.

    I'm happy to talk further if you're interested.

    Sean Lyons
    University of Guelph

    From: "Scott Comber" <Scott.Comber@DAL.CA>
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:15:59 PM
    Subject: [OB-LIST] Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

    Dear Colleagues,
     
    I am interested in using this survey (Rokeach) with millennial business students in order to see if their values change over a period of time (years). 
     
    For those of you that are familiar with this survey, what are your thoughts on it? 
     
    What other value-based survey  tools would you recommend?
     
    Many thank, Scott
     
    Join the conversation on Twitter: @ScottatDal
    Connect with me on LinkedIn:  http://ca.linkedin.com/in/shift
     
    <image003.jpg>
    Scott Comber PhD
    Assistant Professor
    Rowe School of Business, Dalhousie University
    Kenneth C. Rowe Management Building
    6100 University Avenue, Room  4112
    Halifax, Nova Scotia  B3H 3J5
    voice: 902.494.7820
     
     








  • 10.  Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions

    Posted 06-29-2013 18:32
    On a tangent, those interested in values can check out past conference programs of the International Society for the the Study of Work and Organizational Values (ISSWOV) on their website: www.isswov.org. The next conference is in Riga, Latvia, from June 29th-July 2nd, 2014, with Geert Hofstede as the keynote speaker.

    Sanjay Menon


    Sanjay T. Menon, Ph.D.,

    Department of Management & Marketing

    Louisiana State University Shreveport

    1 University Place

    Shreveport, LA 71115.

    Tel: (318) 797 5186

    Fax: (318) 797 5176

    e-mail: Sanjay.Menon@lsus.edu


    _____

    From: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv on behalf of Sean Lyons
    Sent: Sat 6/29/2013 11:07 AM
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions


    For those interested in the PVQ, an updated version (the PVQ5X), measuring a refined 19-factor values domain is provided (including items) in:

    Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., ... & Konty, M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 103(4), Oct 2012, 663-688.

    Sean Lyons, PhD
    www.gencareershift.ca
    Department of Business
    College of Management and Economics
    University of Guelph
    50 Stone Road East
    Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
    Canada
    Fax: (519) 824-3087


    _____

    From: "Romie Littrell" <littrellaom@YAHOO.CO.NZ>
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 5:17:54 AM
    Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions


    And also see:

    Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of cross-cultural Psychology, 32(5), 519-542.




    2013 conference: http://leadershipinrussia.homestead.com/

    Romie Frederick Littrell, PhD, FIAIR
    Editor, AIB Insights; International Management Area Editor, International Journal of Emerging Markets
    AUT Business School, Tel. extension 5805, Mail stop B-31


    _____

    From: Romie Littrell <littrellaom@yahoo.co.nz>
    To: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv <OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU>
    Sent: Saturday, 29 June 2013, 21:17
    Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions


    The SVS has been superseded by the PVQ in terms of reliability.

    See:



    Ralston, D.A., Egri, C.P., Reynaud, E., Srinivasan, N., Furrer, O., Brock, D., Alas, R., Wangenheim, F., Darder, F.L., Mellahi, K., Kuo, C., Potocan, V., Mockaitis, A.I., Szabo, E., Gutiérrez, J.R., Pekerti, A., Butt, A., Palmer, I., Naoumova, I., Lenartowicz, T., Starkus, A., Thanh, H.V., Dalgic, T., Molteni, M., de la Garza Carranza, M.T., Maignan, I., Castro, F.B., Moon, Y-L., Terpstra-Tong, J., Dabic, M., Li, Y., Danis, W., Kangasniemi, M., Ansari, M., Riddle, L., Milton, L., Hallinger, P., Elenkov, D., Girson, I., Gelbuda, M., Ramburuth, P., Casado, T., Rossi, A.M., Richards, M., Van Deusen, C., Fu, P.P., Wan, P.M.K., Tang, M., Lee, C-H., Chia, H-B., Fan, Y., & Wallace, A.(2011). A 21st century assessment of values across the global workforce. Journal of Business Ethics, 104: 1-31.




    2013 conference: http://leadershipinrussia.homestead.com/

    Romie Frederick Littrell, PhD, FIAIR
    Editor, AIB Insights; International Management Area Editor, International Journal of Emerging Markets
    AUT Business School, Tel. extension 5805, Mail stop B-31


    _____

    From: Shaun Hansen <sdhphd@GMAIL.COM>
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    Sent: Wednesday, 26 June 2013, 7:53
    Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions


    See:

    http://psycnet.apa.org/books/12171/004





    Sent from my mobile device

    sdhphd@gmail.com




    On Jun 25, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Sean Lyons <slyons01@UOGUELPH.CA> wrote:



    Hi Scott,

    I have been studying the values and work values of different generations for over a decade and I have some suggestions for you. Actually, my research colleague is your colleague Ed Ng. You may want to chat with him about what we've done regarding work values of the Millennials and other generations.

    I would suggest that the Rokeach value survey has been superseded in the past 20 years by the Schwartz Value Survey. The SVS had been studied in a large number of countries and has very strong reliability. It breaks down the value domain very predictably into 10 value types that form 4 superordinate domains. It's much more theoretically and empirically robust that the Rokeach. Also, because the Rokeach is a ranking instrument, it makes it less amenable to analysis than a rating measure like the SVS. You can certainly compare rankings at time 1 and time 2, but there are a host of issues with rank-order correlations that might give you pause.

    If you're interested in studying work values as opposed to just general values, I have an instrument that I have developed that has been used in a number of international studies of Millennials.

    I'm happy to talk further if you're interested.

    Sean Lyons
    University of Guelph


    _____

    From: "Scott Comber" <Scott.Comber@DAL.CA>
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:15:59 PM
    Subject: [OB-LIST] Rokeach Value Survery - suggestions


    Dear Colleagues,

    I am interested in using this survey (Rokeach) with millennial business students in order to see if their values change over a period of time (years).

    For those of you that are familiar with this survey, what are your thoughts on it?

    What other value-based survey tools would you recommend?

    Many thank, Scott

    Join the conversation on Twitter: @ScottatDal
    Connect with me on LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/shift

    <image003.jpg>
    Scott Comber PhD
    Assistant Professor
    Rowe School of Business, Dalhousie University
    Kenneth C. Rowe Management Building
    6100 University Avenue, Room 4112
    Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3J5
    voice: 902.494.7820











    This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee(s) and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, and/or EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this communication in error, please destroy all copies of the message, whether in electronic or hard copy format, as well as attachments and immediately contact the sender by replying to this email.