Discussion: View Thread

self-assessments, the MBTI in particular

  • 1.  self-assessments, the MBTI in particular

    Posted 02-11-2008 19:33
    The purpose of the Myers Briggs for me, in my teaching, is to help students
    understand that others aren't crazy, they're just different. We tend to
    discount the go with the flow types if we're very structured/organized and
    vice versa; we tend to discount the emotional decision-makers if we're very
    rational and vice versa. If we can understand viscerally that attending to
    the preferences/perspectives of others makes our ability to gather
    information and make good decisions better, we are ahead of the game.

    I tell my students that preferences are not abilities... that we can all
    exert extravert skills for example, but that it's harder, more energy
    intensive. And I am sure to let them know that one diagnostic instrument is
    not the Whole Picture of who they are, but one view of a point in time.

    I do think that these kinds of instruments can be interesting and useful if
    properly framed.

    Susan

    Susan Herman, Professor School of Management
    Director, Northern Leadership Center
    University of Alaska Fairbanks
    P.O. Box 756080
    Fairbanks, Alaska 99775-6080
    907-474-1939 (o)
    907-474-5219 (f)
    www.uaf.edu/nlc



    -----Original Message-----
    From: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv
    [mailto:OB@AOMLISTS.pace.edu] On Behalf Of Blanco, R Ivan
    Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2008 6:56 PM
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.pace.edu
    Subject: Re: self-assessments

    Dear Colleagues,



    Our abilities and capabilities change over time. What we are today may not
    be what we are tomorrow. Education, experiences, maturity, and other
    processes change us over time. What is the true benefit of these
    self-assessment tools? I have been put through t-training, marriage
    counseling, the Myers Briggs and others during the last 30 plus years, and I
    still don't know what those things had done for me. Do they really help the
    students? Or, do we want to believe they do? Do we know how many students
    we might have driven away from many good things in their lives with these
    self-assessment tests? What if we do more harm than good? I am convinced
    that most of those assessment tools are even dangerous in the hands of
    highly trained professionals. Honestly, what good do they do if we have the
    students for only one semester and cannot do any type of follow on what
    happens to them in the long-term? (No sales pitch, please!) Is it our
    responsibility to expose them to professional or technical know-how or to
    engage ourselves directly in their emotional development as individuals?



    In my more than 40 years of involvement with organizations (as
    employee/manager, student of organizations and as a teacher) I have learned
    that not everyone can be "saved" and that in many situations we are not well
    equipped to do so.


    Sincerely,

    Ivan


    Dr. R. Ivan Blanco
    Department of Management
    McCoy College of Business Administration
    Texas State University - San Marcos
    San Marcos, TX 78666
    Phone (512) 245-1842
    Fax (512) 245-2850
    rb39@txstate.edu
    _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

    The trouble with other cultures is that the people don't behave the way
    they're supposed to, that is, like us. The solution to this difficulty is
    not to expect them to." Craig Storti, The Art of Crossing Cultures (1990).
    _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

    Las naciones marchan al termino de su grandeza con el mismo paso que camina
    su educacion.
    Nations march toward their greatness at the same pace as their educational
    systems evolve. Simon Bolivar
    = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


    ________________________________

    From: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv on behalf of eric larsen
    Sent: Sat 2/9/2008 3:38 PM
    To: OB@AOMLISTS.pace.edu
    Subject: Re: self-assessments


    Dear Those Interested:

    My initial response on this matter was in part because I myself had once
    underestimated just how seriously some students can take these assessments.
    Upon some reflection, I would have expressed my initial e-mail in this
    thread differently. My, somewhat alarmist, response was in part meant to
    encourage further thought in the one or two future self-assessment users
    whom also might not appreciate the potential impact of these
    self-assessments and to encourage "our" caring and highly engaged
    involvement with our students through these processes.

    Both James G. Clawson and Robert F. Hurley have demonstrated seriously focus
    in these matters. For my part, I consider these two individuals to be among
    those worth looking to for the lead in this matter.

    Cordially,
    Eric C., T. E., Larsen






    ________________________________



    > Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 18:59:14 -0500
    > From: ClawsonJ@DARDEN.VIRGINIA.EDU
    > Subject: Re: self-assessments
    > To: OB@AOMLISTS.pace.edu
    >
    > I agree heartily w/ Eric's concern and that's the reason why we counsel
    our students (all FY MBA students did this for the last three years) that no
    single instrument is accurate enough or comprehensive enough to hang your
    hat on. Only when patterns recur in multiple data pools do we begin to
    "believe.". We also assert that the strength of each subsequent insight or
    life theme can be assesed by the volume of data, the number of instruments,
    the volume of disconfirming data (who has none?), and the quality of the
    logic relating each datum to the indeced theme label.
    > Respectfully,
    > Jim
    > --------------------------
    > James G. Clawson
    > Sent using BlackBerry
    >
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv <OB@AOMLISTS.pace.edu>
    > To: OB@AOMLISTS.pace.edu <OB@AOMLISTS.pace.edu>
    > Sent: Fri Feb 08 17:16:28 2008
    > Subject: Re: self-assessments
    >
    > Dear Those Interested:
    >
    > Not that anyone is not being sensitive enough, but because it is not known
    how people might take this thread, I offer the following:
    >
    > As a graduate student I got handed the enviable task of providing feedback
    on about 1,800 (yes 1,800) reflection papers based on self-assessments. The
    sample doing the reflecting was comprised of MBA students and this process
    took place over a four year period. Please beware the casual use of any
    self-assessment assignments, be they "off the shelf", "packaged for profit",
    or in some other way handled by technology that might not account for 100%
    of individual differences in classifying individuals (n.b., does not leave
    any tools I am aware of). Serious focus on what individual students are
    taking away from these self-assessment experiences is warranted. Academics
    are often undercompensated for their time, and while I thus understand the
    interest in leverage and scalability, please remember that these students
    are real people who have come to us for growth and in some cases help. I am
    not saying "do not use these tools." I am asking that you realize the
    potential of underestimating the power of these tools and take appropriate
    precautions as such.
    >
    > Cordially,
    > Eric C., T. E., Larsen
    >
    >
    > Scholar and Faculty
    >
    >
    >
    > Department of Management
    >
    > School of Business
    >
    > SUNY: University at Albany
    >
    >
    >
    > School of Business and Technology
    >
    > Endicott College
    >
    >
    >
    > Department of Management
    >
    > Bertolon School of Business
    >
    > SalemState College
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ________________________________
    >
    >
    >
    > > Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:32:55 -0500
    > > From: aneil.mishra@MBA.WFU.EDU
    > > Subject: Re: self-assessments
    > > To: OB@AOMLISTS.pace.edu
    > >
    > > I haven't read all the postings on this thread, so I apologize if I'm
    > > repeating material that others have suggested. I did have the time to
    read
    > > Jim Clawsen's posting, and I wholeheartedly agree with trying to help
    > > students find patterns across different assessments. I'm a big fan of
    MBTI,
    > > use the StrengthsFinder 2.0 assessment (Gallup), FIRO-B, and the
    Competing
    > > Values framework and assessment developed by my mentors Kim Cameron and
    Bob
    > > Quinn at Michigan along with their colleagues. I've used all quite
    > > successfully individually, but the real power (and validity I believe)
    comes
    > > from finding intersections across these different instruments which are
    > > based on theories or empiricism that are quite different from one
    another.
    > >
    > > I look forward to reading the rest of these postings on this thread.
    > >
    > > Aneil Mishra
    > > Wake Forest U.
    > > MBTI Type: ESTP
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ________________________________
    >
    > Connect and share in new ways with Windows Live. Get it now!
    <http://www.windowslive.com/share.html?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_Wave2_sharelife_012008
    >




    ________________________________

    Shed those extra pounds with MSN and The Biggest Loser! Learn more.
    <http://biggestloser.msn.com/>