Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  Review of Emotional Intelligence Research

    Posted 05-18-2007 18:50

    Dear Colleagues,

     

    I am conducting a review of emotional intelligence research. I would greatly appreciate it if you could forward by back-channel any in- or pre-press papers, or articles that may not yet be reflected in the relevant databases? I will summarize the titles of the articles received for the list.

     

    Thanks so much!

     

    Sue

     

     

    (P.S. Apologies any cross-posting.)

    _____________________________________________________

    Susan David, Ph.D.

     

    Postdoctoral Research Associate, <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:city w:st="on">Yale University</st1:city>, <st1:country-region w:st="on">USA</st1:country-region></st1:place>

    Postdoctoral Research Fellow, The University of <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:city w:st="on">Melbourne</st1:city>, <st1:country-region w:st="on">Australia</st1:country-region></st1:place>

     

    <st1:address w:st="on"><st1:street w:st="on">PO Box</st1:street> 382206</st1:address>

    Harvard Square

    Cambridge MA 02238

    USA

     

    susan.david@yale.edu

    +1 617 335 7335 (USA)

    +61 3 8640 0489 (Australia)

     



  • 2.  Review of Emotional Intelligence Research

    Posted 05-20-2007 09:37

    The Grubb and McDaniel (2007) paper cited below suggests that Bar-On' EQI short form is substantially fakable and thus ill-suited for high stakes testing situations such as employment screening.  It also suggests that most of the variance of the instrument is captured by the Big 5 casting doubt on assertions that the measure assesses something different from well established constructs such as the Big 5.

    Grubb, W.L., III & McDaniel, M.A. (2007). The fakability of Bar-On's Emotional Quotient Inventory Short Form: Catch me if you can. Human Performance, 20, 43-59.

    The paper cited below refers to one of the Mayer & Salovey instruments and argues that it does not measure much other than the big 5 and cognitive ability.

    Emotional intelligence: Not much more than g and personality.  Schulte, Melanie J.; Ree, Malcolm James; Carretta, Thomas R.; Personality and Individual Differences, Vol 37(5), Oct 2004. pp. 1059-1068.

    I hope this helps.

    Best wishes,

    Mike



    Susan David <sdavid@SENT.COM>
    Sent by: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv <OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU>

    05/18/2007 06:50 PM

    Please respond to
    sdavid@sent.com
    To
    		OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    cc
    Subject
    		Review of Emotional Intelligence Research





    Dear Colleagues,
     
    I am conducting a review of emotional intelligence research. I would greatly appreciate it if you could forward by back-channel any in- or pre-press papers, or articles that may not yet be reflected in the relevant databases? I will summarize the titles of the articles received for the list.
     
    Thanks so much!
     
    Sue
     
     
    (P.S. Apologies any cross-posting.)
    _____________________________________________________
    Susan David, Ph.D.
     
    Postdoctoral Research Associate, Yale University, USA
    Postdoctoral Research Fellow, The University of Melbourne, Australia
     
    PO Box 382206
    Harvard Square
    Cambridge MA 02238
    USA
     
    susan.david@yale.edu
    +1 617 335 7335 (USA)
    +61 3 8640 0489 (Australia)
     



  • 3.  Review of Emotional Intelligence Research

    Posted 05-20-2007 11:31
    .....ah, finally, a perspective that questions assumptions!
    Nice paper Mike!

    Here are two papers (listed in Business Source Premier so
    you might not have them Sue) that show that EQ measures are
    probably not useful for predicting leadership. The first
    paper is a commentary and the second a reply; however, both
    can be read as free-standing articles:

    http://www.hec.unil.ch/jantonakis/Antonakis%20IJOA%20critique%20rejoinder%20FINAL.pdf

    http://www.hec.unil.ch/jantonakis/Antonakis%20IJOA%20critique%20final.pdf

    Regards,
    John Antonakis

    ----- Original Message -----
    Expéditeur: Michael A McDaniel/AC/VCU <mamcdani@vcu.edu>
    à: OB@aomlists.pace.edu
    Sujet: Re: Review of Emotional Intelligence Research
    Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 09:36:59 -0400

    > The Grubb and McDaniel (2007) paper cited below suggests
    > that Bar-On' EQI short form is substantially fakable and
    > thus ill-suited for high stakes testing situations such
    > as employment screening. It also suggests that most of
    > the variance of the instrument is captured by the Big 5
    > casting doubt on assertions that the measure assesses
    > something different from well established constructs such
    > as the Big 5. Grubb, W.L., III & McDaniel, M.A. (2007).
    > The fakability of Bar-On?s Emotional Quotient Inventory
    > Short Form: Catch me if you can. Human Performance, 20,
    > 43-59. The paper cited below refers to one of the Mayer &
    > Salovey instruments and argues that it does not measure
    > much other than the big 5 and cognitive ability.
    >
    > Emotional intelligence: Not much more than g and
    > personality. Schulte, Melanie J.; Ree, Malcolm James;
    > Carretta, Thomas R.; Personality and Individual
    > Differences, Vol 37(5), Oct 2004. pp. 1059-1068.
    >
    > I hope this helps.
    >
    > Best wishes,
    >
    > Mike
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Susan David <sdavid@SENT.COM>
    > Sent by: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv
    > <OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU> 05/18/2007 06:50 PM
    > Please respond to
    > sdavid@sent.com
    >
    >
    > To
    > OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    > cc
    >
    > Subject
    > Review of Emotional Intelligence Research
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Dear Colleagues,
    >
    > I am conducting a review of emotional intelligence
    > research. I would greatly appreciate it if you could
    > forward by back-channel any in- or pre-press papers, or
    > articles that may not yet be reflected in the relevant
    > databases? I will summarize the titles of the articles
    > received for the list.
    >
    > Thanks so much!
    >
    > Sue
    >
    >
    > (P.S. Apologies any cross-posting.)
    > _____________________________________________________
    > Susan David, Ph.D.
    >
    > Postdoctoral Research Associate, Yale University, USA
    > Postdoctoral Research Fellow, The University of Melbourne,
    > Australia
    >
    > PO Box 382206
    > Harvard Square
    > Cambridge MA 02238
    > USA
    >
    > susan.david@yale.edu
    > +1 617 335 7335 (USA)
    > +61 3 8640 0489 (Australia)
    >
    >
    >
    > [Pièce jointe: _1_074CF990074CF3C8004AC975852572E1]

    ___________________________________

    Prof. John Antonakis
    Faculty of Business and Economics
    University of Lausanne
    Internef #527
    CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny
    Switzerland

    Tel: ++41 (0)21 692-3438
    Fax: ++41 (0)21 692-3305

    http://www.hec.unil.ch/jantonakis